rdubnpk This morning the CIA director was giving explicit details, including the fact the Osama was unarmed at the time of his death. I have no sympathy for the man, but wonder why the US finds it necessary to reveal every single detail. He deserved what he got but shooting an unarmed man makes the whole thing look bad.
Because if they don't release the details then all of the crackpots will make up the story to fill in the gaps.
okay I got it now I thought you were supporting this maniac. Thanks for the clarification. QUOTE=dboyte;394745]He is buried at the bottom of the ocean. I will be happy to invite the reste of them to go visit him there. Get my point????[/QUOTE]
All I can say is.......sucks to be him....lol....he got what he deserved...double tapped, once in the chest, once in the eye. Would love to shake the hand of the man that did it.
Full disclosure. You put everything out there and let people deal with it any way they need to. If you hold anything back and something comes out later, and it would, people start wondering what else isn't being told. Personally when I think of the almost 3,000 UNARMED civilians killed on 9/11 plus so many of the responders that have died since from being exposed to the debris - I really don't give a crap whether he was armed or not. That 3000 doesn't even count the other terrorist attacks he master-minded prior to 9/11. I say - Good riddance!! Firm
rdubnpk It is the same thing with strategies of the wars, etc. Its like if we don't tell everyone EVERYTHING we plan to do................... WE need to just shut up and play sometimes.
rdubnpk You badly misconstrue my meaning. Wouldst that I was the one to have pulled the trigger on that SOB. For anyone to hide behind religion to do what he has done makes it doubly bad. The only thing that would have made this better is if it had happened years ago. And besides, my birthday is 9/11. Enough said.
