It would free up a little bit of space, but the amount is so small I'm not sure it's worth it. I'd rather concentrate on reducing lurkers and creepers than people who don't visit any more.
I just want to be sure that lingerie pics (not topless) are ok. Don't want to be put on the bad boy list as I appreciate the site and want to be sure I am doing everything right. Thanks
At Cancun Swingers Lifestyle Couples Forum you can upload albums too and there are absolutely no restrictions on adult content. If folks want to share sexy pics then I'd suggest uploading them there and then sharing the link with people you want to see them via private message.
Probably going to be the worst thing I ever said on here, but here goes... Even though the no nudity in albums and threads is a bummer, I do appreciate the policy. I pretty much only post Monday-Friday during the workday. And there have been plenty of times i have been scrolling down a page, and then boom there is a nude shot. I have to make sure my hand is on the trigger(aka mouse scroll) so I can get quickly past it before anyone walks past my desk and notices what is on my screen. This same fear prevents me from paging through any of the albums, cause sometimes you never know what your going to see next when hitting that 'next' button. Then again, even some of the non-nude pictures would still raise some eyebrows (and something else), at least it wouldn't violate corp policy.
Steve, I really like the new rules. Not to sound prudish or anything, but I've rec'd more strange posts/pms this year from people I don't know at all.
Alright, I scrubbed our albums. I didn't have anything too bad but some did go beyond the rules. It broke my heart to take some of them down but I don't want the whole thing gone. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go sulk for a while. :aktion034:
We nuked quite a few of our photos that crossed the now clearly defined line of compliance as outlined. Enough said about that. The profiles which stand out to us as likely being those of creepers/trolls are the many who have been on here for a few years yet have zero pics, zero to very few posts (<5), no Roll Call posts w/dates (reasonably indicative of having not been to TTR), and either zero friends or a few but exclusively "hot" women. Often when we check who has viewed our profile it seems ~15% fit the description, some names recognized as being repeat offenders. The glass half full viewpoint would be that could be considered an 85% success ratio, for lack of a better term. Without being interweb whizzes ourselves we do wonder how challenging, and likely more lucrative, it would be to bump that figure considerably higher. To us newbs it seems simple enough for a software to essentially pass/fail each profile at its anniversary date based on a few basic criteria points, defined in the user agreement, negating any need for personal baby-sitting on the part of a website owner/administrator. There's our $0.02 Canadian, take it for more than its worth.
